What Does Research Say About the Cost of Different Insulin Types?
A major review of global studies examines whether newer insulin analogues offer better value than traditional human insulins for adults with Type 1 diabetes.
Evidence label explains the kind of source behind this article (for example peer-reviewed literature vs community video). It is not medical advice.
Key takeaways
- Researchers reviewed 35 studies comparing different insulin regimens across 19 countries to understand which insulins offer the best value for money.
- Both long-acting and short-acting insulin analogues were often reported as cost-effective compared to human insulins, but the strength of this evidence varies.
- Most studies were computer models created by insulin manufacturers, which means results should be interpreted carefully and may not reflect real-world costs in your country.
- Cost-effectiveness depends heavily on local healthcare prices, insurance coverage, and individual patient outcomes—what works financially in one country may differ elsewhere.
Understanding the Research Question
When people with Type 1 diabetes choose an insulin regimen, cost matters alongside effectiveness. Newer insulin analogues—synthetic insulins designed to work in specific ways—have been available for decades, but whether they're worth the extra expense compared to traditional human insulins remains debated. Researchers from multiple countries decided to examine all published economic studies on this question to see what the evidence actually shows.
How the Review Was Conducted
An international team searched medical databases through March 2025 for full economic studies comparing insulin regimens in adults with Type 1 diabetes. They found 35 studies covering 50 different insulin comparisons across 19 countries, mostly in Europe. The researchers converted all costs to 2024 U.S. dollars using purchasing power parity—a method that accounts for different price levels across countries—to make fair comparisons.
What the Studies Found
Both long-acting and short-acting insulin analogues were often reported as cost-effective compared with human insulins. For short-acting insulins, cost-effectiveness ranged from $88 to $7,844 per 1% reduction in HbA1c annually per patient. Long-acting insulins showed wider variation, with costs ranging from $17 to $10,940 per 1% HbA1c reduction. When researchers looked at quality-of-life measures, short-acting analogues ranged from $7,382 to $34,769 per quality-adjusted life year, while long-acting insulins showed a much broader range.
The bottom line: under study-specific assumptions, analogue-based regimens often appeared cost-effective, with quality-of-life gains valued at $4,550 to $10,720 per quality-adjusted life year.
Important Limitations
The researchers found a significant issue: 97% of studies were computer-based models rather than real-world observations, and 86% were funded by insulin manufacturers. This matters because model-based studies rely on assumptions that may not match actual patient experiences or healthcare costs. The wide range of results across studies suggests that local factors—such as your country's drug prices, insurance policies, and how well different insulins work for individual patients—play a huge role in whether an insulin is truly cost-effective.
The authors concluded that while insulin analogues are often reported as cost-effective, this conclusion depends heavily on how studies are designed and funded. Before making decisions about your own insulin regimen, it's important to discuss costs and coverage with your healthcare team, as what's cost-effective in research may not match what's affordable or available where you live.
Evidence label
Source: Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research. Evidence type: PubMed indexed literature. Type1Cure is an information and intelligence hub, not a medical advice service. This article summarizes published research and does not provide diagnosis, treatment, or personal medical guidance. Always talk to your own care team before changing anything about your Type 1 diabetes management.
Type1Cure is an information and intelligence hub, not a medical advice service. This article summarizes published research and does not provide diagnosis, treatment, or personal medical guidance. Always talk to your own care team before changing anything about your Type 1 diabetes management.
Related reading
More evidence-labeled coverage across the Type1Cure library.
- Living With T1DWhat We're Learning About Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Type 1 Diabetes: A French StudyPubMed indexed literature
- Living With T1DCorrection to "The Use of an Automated Insulin Delivery System Is Associated With a Reduction in Diabetes Distress and Improvement in Quality of Life in People With Type 1 Diabetes".PubMed indexed literature
- Living With T1DA New Class of Biologics Could Change How We Treat Type 1 DiabetesPubMed indexed literature
- Living With T1DMenopause and Type 1 Diabetes: What Women Need to KnowPubMed indexed literature
- Living With T1DThe Promise and Challenge of Oral Insulin: Where the Research StandsPubMed indexed literature
- Living With T1DYour Glucose Range May Not Be the Guideline Range—And That's Worth UnderstandingPubMed indexed literature